Technology & commercial design
Start with a real task, a complete workflow and a clear next decision.
Explore our work ↗MAINNET / AI TIME SAVINGS CALCULATOR
The hour AI
gives back.
A faster draft is only part of the work. Count preparation, review, rework and upkeep to see how much human time your AI workflow could actually release.
Your inputs stay in this calculator. Copy or print if you want to keep them.
Illustrative example · replace with your numbers
Net human time released each week
Under these assumptions, time becomes available each week. Check quality, then decide how that time will be used.
less human work
4 weeks, net of setup
Setup-time break-even
weeks
Time estimates only. Comparable quality is a separate gate; released hours are not cash savings. Negative results mean additional work.
THE WHOLE WORKFLOW
Make the hidden
minutes visible.
This is a transparent planning model. Replace the example with observed averages, keep the task mix comparable and record uncertainty alongside the result.
01 / WEEKLY HUMAN WORKBefore = tasks × baseline minutes ÷ 60.
With AI = tasks × [preparation + review + (rework % ÷ 100 × extra rework minutes)] ÷ 60 + upkeep minutes ÷ 60.
02 / TIME RELEASEDWeekly net = before − with AI.
Horizon net = weeks × weekly net − setup hours.
03 / SETUP RECOVERYBreak-even weeks = setup hours ÷ weekly net, when weekly net is positive. With no recurring time gain, the setup time is not recovered through this model.
Count person-hours, not just elapsed clock time. If two people each spend ten minutes, record twenty human minutes. Do not add unattended machine time unless it prevents someone from doing other work. Keep that convention consistent in both workflows.
The hour AI gives back — pilot sheet
A SMALL, REAL EXPERIMENT
Try one workflow.
Keep an honest record.
Use two weeks as a starting rhythm: establish the baseline, trial the assisted workflow, then decide. Extend the observation period for rare, seasonal or highly variable work.
The question is not only whether the result arrived sooner. Did the whole job require less human work at an acceptable quality?
Who gets the hour?
Before calling the pilot a success, put the released time somewhere real. A change in the calendar or workload makes the purpose of the experiment visible.
Workflow / ownerObservation dates / sample sizeDecision / use of released time
Before trusting the number.
Does “time saved” mean money saved?
No. This tool measures human hours. Cash savings need a separate assessment of actual spending, subscriptions, integration costs and what changes in the business. Released capacity may be useful even when expenditure stays the same.
What if the answer is negative?
The model is saying that review, rework or upkeep exceeds the time removed from the original task. Keep that result. It gives you a specific workflow to improve, reduce in scope or stop.
What about waiting for the model?
Count waiting as human time only when a person is tied up and cannot use it for other work. Count machine runtime separately when assessing costs. Apply the same rule to waiting in the original process.
What if quality changes?
Agree an acceptance threshold before the trial and inspect actual outputs. Compare time only for outputs that meet it. More speed, fewer minutes or a positive break-even cannot establish accuracy or suitability.
Take the question further.
BRING ONE REAL WORKFLOW
A useful hour starts
with a good question.
Tell us what you are trying to improve, where the work gets stuck and what an acceptable result looks like.
Start a conversation ↗