Time has a structure
Compare how long an asset needs with how long its capital can wait. An attractive project can still have the wrong funding horizon.
02 / OUR EXPERTISE
Can the project move forward when people disagree?
A founder sees a product. An investor sees exposure. A partner sees tomorrow’s work. A useful fund or project structure makes room for all three: who decides, who contributes, who carries the downside and when to revisit the agreement.
Compare how long an asset needs with how long its capital can wait. An attractive project can still have the wrong funding horizon.
Translate expressions of support into contributions, timing and conditions. Model what happens when one contribution arrives late.
Map decision rights, incentives and exit questions. Identify the terms that need specialist legal or tax review.
QUESTIONS THAT MATTER
Who contributes and who decides? Do asset and funding horizons fit? How are value and risk shared?
WHAT YOU LEAVE WITH
The precise scope, deliverables and engagement model are agreed after understanding the project.
CAPITAL / THE GROUND RULES
Four tools, four different sets of questions. Understand how they work before considering whether they fit.
Share the building. Keep each room’s accounts in order.
Choose the fund’s port. Then read the navigation rules.
Before handing over the keys, write down whom the door is for.
Agree the rainy-day bill while the sky is clear.
An introduction with official further reading, not individual legal, tax or investment advice. Actual arrangements depend on applicable law, documents and circumstances.
Return to the meaning of capital ↗A CONVERSATION IS A GOOD BEGINNING